Comments on: Email list legal battle foggy but important

by: Deepak

Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:56:25 +0000

I would also like to know whether “Famil Construction Company” exists in UK or not. Because I have received a lucurative job offer from this company without any personal face to face interview.
Best regards

by: Dars

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:59:50 +0000

I would like to know whether Famil Construction Company exist in UK or it is fraud, as I have received a very lucrative job to work in UK without any interview.

by: chirag

Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:50:03 +0000

i would like to know wheather famil construction co. is existed or not

by: SK SINGH

Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:49 +0000

by: suree

Sat, 12 May 2007 10:34:00 +0000

I want to know in uk have company is name ” Famil construction company ” and address, Telephone no. also.
Best Regards,

by: Robert

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:28:20 +0000

Identity theft is just one part of the problem. To learn more about the various types of scams out there, go to…identitysafetytips.com. Protect yourself from identity theft by understanding how and where your information is the most vulnerable to thieves. Then implement a plan to protect against identity theft. identity protection

by: john

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:52:09 +0000

I have gone through the above article and it is interesting and I appreciate to the author and I to have a link related to refer with more information. and I feel it will be helpful to you.Success University

by: Kieren

Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:31:11 +0000

Hey David,

Yes I noticed. The Guardian has done a piece about it.

I wonder when the judge will make his decision. Possibly Monday. I don’t know. Oxford Uni’s lawyer in the case are a very unfriendly bunch. And I’m not in the mood to speak to Speak.

Frankly I think a potentially nasty precedent has been avoided here. I find it a little worrying that this email list thing was entered into so quickly.

Nothing on Speak’s site as yet.

Kieren

by: David

Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:19:36 +0000

Well in the end, the SPEAK protagonists were acquitted over a technicality. Luckily the two defendents passed control of the list to a third party abroad, so were not in a position to hand it over anyway.

by: David

Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:46:09 +0000

It has just occurred to me that the High Court mayn’t order the e-mail list to be handed over in court today.

The list was only required by the University at that particular time (by 4pm on Saturday 21st October), so that it could send out an e-mail itself to explain to those on the list why SPEAK were wrong in their e-mail alert of 16th October.

The question is whether the University still wants to contact those on the list three months later.