<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decide the Sex.com tagline&#8230; but fast</title>
	<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/</link>
	<description>An infuriatingly infrequently updated reflection on the Internet, the US, and life in general</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-49084</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 11:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-49084</guid>
					<description>LMFAO
Oh Randy, Randy, Randy... someone's got too much free time on their hands!
Can you say &quot;overreaction&quot;? Or do you actually think that someone banning you for being a tool is morally equivalent to murdering millions of people?

You suck at life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMFAO<br />
Oh Randy, Randy, Randy&#8230; someone&#8217;s got too much free time on their hands!<br />
Can you say &#8220;overreaction&#8221;? Or do you actually think that someone banning you for being a tool is morally equivalent to murdering millions of people?</p>
<p>You suck at life.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-49081</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 11:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-49081</guid>
					<description>LOL. I love it. My own personal Godwin's Law website.
Cheers, Randy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. I love it. My own personal Godwin&#8217;s Law website.<br />
Cheers, Randy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47734</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47734</guid>
					<description>Please don't listen to him - I enjoy reading your posts here on ICANN as well as the other topics you cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t listen to him - I enjoy reading your posts here on ICANN as well as the other topics you cover.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47551</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47551</guid>
					<description>I should point out that this is not the first time Randy has appeared and chosen to ignore everyone's considerations but his own. Some of his previous posts elsewhere have been deleted for reasons varying from abuse, to threats, to unreasonable and incorrect accusations.

Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should point out that this is not the first time Randy has appeared and chosen to ignore everyone&#8217;s considerations but his own. Some of his previous posts elsewhere have been deleted for reasons varying from abuse, to threats, to unreasonable and incorrect accusations.</p>
<p>Kieren
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47543</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47543</guid>
					<description>I'm following your thinking here Graham. 

My publisher - who will probably read this - is trying to push the decision to tomorrow (Wed) morning. I strongly suspect because he has grown attached to the &quot;One domain, two men...&quot; line and doesn't want it undermined by, er, public opinion.

I'm thinking just kill &quot;dubious&quot; and you have a fairly tight tag. Will sleep on it. I'm hoping inspiration will come...

How are you anyway Graham? I've been insanely busy - been following you through Twitter postings arriving on my mobile.

Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m following your thinking here Graham. </p>
<p>My publisher - who will probably read this - is trying to push the decision to tomorrow (Wed) morning. I strongly suspect because he has grown attached to the &#8220;One domain, two men&#8230;&#8221; line and doesn&#8217;t want it undermined by, er, public opinion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking just kill &#8220;dubious&#8221; and you have a fairly tight tag. Will sleep on it. I&#8217;m hoping inspiration will come&#8230;</p>
<p>How are you anyway Graham? I&#8217;ve been insanely busy - been following you through Twitter postings arriving on my mobile.</p>
<p>Kieren
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47539</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47539</guid>
					<description>Randy,

Fuck you. You're banned. Although you won't be able to read this since I have blocked your IP address.

I just don't understand why people think they can be rude, offensive, invade your space and then expect you to be nothing but pleasant back.


Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy,</p>
<p>Fuck you. You&#8217;re banned. Although you won&#8217;t be able to read this since I have blocked your IP address.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t understand why people think they can be rude, offensive, invade your space and then expect you to be nothing but pleasant back.</p>
<p>Kieren
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Graham</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47481</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47481</guid>
					<description>Gaaahhh. tough. The last one

&quot;The $65 million battle for the most valuable word of the Internet age&quot;

It gives us the core fact without the detail or the drama of the first one

&quot;One domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the $65 million battle for the Dubious Jewel in the Internet’s Crown.&quot;

I think the winner is a hybrid of these two sans 'dubious'.

One domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the $65 million battle for the most valuable word of the Internet age

Hmmm? Now if you changed that to

&quot;One domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the $65 million battle for the world's most valuable word&quot;

Would it be factually wrong? Most valuable 'word' lacks punch. Maybe hottest property could nail all that. Lose the 12 years - could sound like a bit of a drag - keep the two men. Lose the domain? The domain clue's in the title already.

&quot;Two men and the brutal $65 million battle for the internet's hottest property&quot;

Hmmm. Dunno. You could use murder and sleaze in there somewhere too.... Sorry, rambling a bit here. Thinking out loud.

Whatever, Brutal = good. Dubious = bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaaahhh. tough. The last one</p>
<p>&#8220;The $65 million battle for the most valuable word of the Internet age&#8221;</p>
<p>It gives us the core fact without the detail or the drama of the first one</p>
<p>&#8220;One domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the $65 million battle for the Dubious Jewel in the Internet’s Crown.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the winner is a hybrid of these two sans &#8216;dubious&#8217;.</p>
<p>One domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the $65 million battle for the most valuable word of the Internet age</p>
<p>Hmmm? Now if you changed that to</p>
<p>&#8220;One domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the $65 million battle for the world&#8217;s most valuable word&#8221;</p>
<p>Would it be factually wrong? Most valuable &#8216;word&#8217; lacks punch. Maybe hottest property could nail all that. Lose the 12 years - could sound like a bit of a drag - keep the two men. Lose the domain? The domain clue&#8217;s in the title already.</p>
<p>&#8220;Two men and the brutal $65 million battle for the internet&#8217;s hottest property&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm. Dunno. You could use murder and sleaze in there somewhere too&#8230;. Sorry, rambling a bit here. Thinking out loud.</p>
<p>Whatever, Brutal = good. Dubious = bad.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47463</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47463</guid>
					<description>I forgot to provide a link to the FAQ. It's on the blog at: http://blog.icann.org/?p=85


Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to provide a link to the FAQ. It&#8217;s on the blog at: <a href='http://blog.icann.org/?p=85' rel='nofollow'>http://blog.icann.org/?p=85</a></p>
<p>Kieren
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47460</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47460</guid>
					<description>I'm sorry but I would like to know why you think it is appropriate to start posting information about RegisterFly on what is clearly a personal blog, and on a subject which has nothing to do with the current registrar issue.

I feel certain you wouldn't like it if I found out where you worked and emailed your boss complaining about your behaviour in your free time. 

Please consider that people are entitled to private lives. If you want to discuss RegisterFly, do so through the various ICANN channels. 

Incidentally, a new and comprehensive RegisterFly FAQ for registrants was posted earlier today. If you are having trouble shifting your domain, please do check it out.

Now, get off my blog.


Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but I would like to know why you think it is appropriate to start posting information about RegisterFly on what is clearly a personal blog, and on a subject which has nothing to do with the current registrar issue.</p>
<p>I feel certain you wouldn&#8217;t like it if I found out where you worked and emailed your boss complaining about your behaviour in your free time. </p>
<p>Please consider that people are entitled to private lives. If you want to discuss RegisterFly, do so through the various ICANN channels. </p>
<p>Incidentally, a new and comprehensive RegisterFly FAQ for registrants was posted earlier today. If you are having trouble shifting your domain, please do check it out.</p>
<p>Now, get off my blog.</p>
<p>Kieren
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anne Martinez - Plaintiff</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47451</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/04/03/decide-the-sexcom-tagline-but-fast/#comment-47451</guid>
					<description>Yep - Classy Action Swim Suite Edition here:

  http://registerfly-lawsuit.com/

News: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;#38;q=Class+action+suite+RegisterFly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep - Classy Action Swim Suite Edition here:</p>
<p>  <a href='http://registerfly-lawsuit.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://registerfly-lawsuit.com/</a></p>
<p>News: <a href='http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Class+action+suite+RegisterFly' rel='nofollow'>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Class+action+suite+RegisterFly</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
