<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Times article version two</title>
	<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/sunday-times-article-version-two/</link>
	<description>An infuriatingly infrequently updated reflection on the Internet, the US, and life in general</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: A Sunday Times article what was written for me at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/sunday-times-article-version-two/#comment-65149</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/sunday-times-article-version-two/#comment-65149</guid>
					<description>[...] And the commissioning editor didn&amp;#8217;t like it. But she was very pleasant about it and didn&amp;#8217;t say &amp;#8220;I don&amp;#8217;t like it&amp;#8221; but offered some other feasible reason. I agreed to rewrite it. So I wrote another version. I like this version too. Anyway, at 8.15pm, I get an email on my Blackberry saying that the piece was ready to go, they had made a few changes, but if I have any problems please call - she&amp;#8217;ll be there until 10.30pm. My Blackberry would only show the first four paras or so, but it was clear it has been comprehensively rewritten. I asked her to add whoever had rehashed it to the byline. She said, no it was fine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And the commissioning editor didn&#8217;t like it. But she was very pleasant about it and didn&#8217;t say &#8220;I don&#8217;t like it&#8221; but offered some other feasible reason. I agreed to rewrite it. So I wrote another version. I like this version too. Anyway, at 8.15pm, I get an email on my Blackberry saying that the piece was ready to go, they had made a few changes, but if I have any problems please call - she&#8217;ll be there until 10.30pm. My Blackberry would only show the first four paras or so, but it was clear it has been comprehensively rewritten. I asked her to add whoever had rehashed it to the byline. She said, no it was fine. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/sunday-times-article-version-two/#comment-64832</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/sunday-times-article-version-two/#comment-64832</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Recent Sale, Book Highlight Value of Sex.Com and Porn.com Domain Names...&lt;/strong&gt;

It's a sad but true fact that seedy domain names are among the most valuable on the Internet. A recent story set to be printed in the UK Sunday Times explores about the utter skullduggery around the sex.com domain name, which was stolen by Stephen Mic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recent Sale, Book Highlight Value of Sex.Com and Porn.com Domain Names&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad but true fact that seedy domain names are among the most valuable on the Internet. A recent story set to be printed in the UK Sunday Times explores about the utter skullduggery around the sex.com domain name, which was stolen by Stephen Mic&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
